Christine Rosen describes multitasking as the “human attempt
to do simultaneously as many things as possible, as quickly as possible,
preferably marshaling the power of as many technologies as possible” (2008, 1,
Rosen). I am interested in this topic as I am frequently busier than I would
like to be. Perhaps this is
uncomfortable for me because I am not a member of the younger generation
discussed in the article. Reflection
seems the natural outgrowth of focus, the antithesis to multitasking. I
wonder, is reflection necessary for
meaningful, long term, learning, or any learning? Meaningful is subjective but if we
consider just the physical aspect, Russell Poldrack has observed physiological
differences in the brain activity of those engaged in multitasking versus focused
learning. I recently attended a meeting
to define the scope of a very large, complex project. We met, literally, in an old farmhouse in the
country; no phones, etc. It was
incredibly effective. We were able to
reflect upon and refine what we were learning through the dialogue and built in
“reflective time”. Many individuals study
a painting or sculpture to arrive at an understanding that can’t be obtained without
studious focus; can one appreciate art without focus?
What an interesting question about reflection you raise here, Karen. I suppose since the beginning of time there have been distractions. Do we live in a culture of greater distraction? Of higher expectation for what one person should be able to accomplish? Why is reflection so difficult to come by for some of us?
ReplyDelete