“the
only really useful practical lesson that emerges from this analytic psychology
in the conduct of large schools is the lesson already reached in a purely
empirical way, that the teacher ought always to impress the class through as
many sensible channels as he can. Talk
and write and draw on the blackboard, permit the pupils to talk, and make them
write and draw, exhibit pictures, plans, and curves, have your diagrams colored
differently in their different parts, etc.; and out of the whole variety of
impressions the individual child will find the most lasting ones for himself.
(pp. 138-139)
James notes that the recommendation that teachers
assess the channel through which each of their students more readily retains
information and then teach the student primarily through that channel is not
really practical in most classrooms and follows that observation with the comment
above. If you read information about UDL
currently available in public (for instance on the CAST website http://www.cast.org/research/index.html
), you find that this concept is considered relatively new. Perhaps it is the particular articulation of
UDL which CAST lays claim to rather than the general concept. I work in the field of special education and
multiple means of representation and expression are a keystone in the design of
specially designed and delivered instruction, but I agree with William James; any
and all students benefit from this approach.
I have certainly found this to be true when I help my children with
concepts that are difficult for them to grasp.
I simply approach the concept differently until I light upon a method or
representation that works for them.
No comments:
Post a Comment