Malcolm Gladwell emphasizes the idea of the cultural
legacy; the persistence of cultural patterns over time. Looking at the culture on one’s ancestors,
and the corresponding belief systems, life styles, and behavioral patterns, one
might predict the behavior of an individual or a group of individuals (such as
the inhabitants of Harlen). When I think
about this point I am reminded of two ideas that have been discussed in our
class. One is Jerome Bruner’s emphasis
on culture in his explanation of the way we learn. Culture, those systems and stimuli that
surround us each and every day and are part of our every waking moment, present
a lens through which everything we learn is viewed and interpreted. Culture instills in each of us a
perspective. This doesn’t mean that
there is no such thing as individualism, and as Bandura noted cultures and
nations are not monolithic, but it does mean that there are understandings that
are shared by groups, and those immersed in a group have a point of departure
for their learning.
The cultural norms that are accepted and promulgated
by a group are then modeled for new citizens in the environment. In this way I believe Gladwell’s theory align’s
with Bandura’s triadic reciprocality.
While it is true that Gladwell may not see the relationship as balanced
and completely reciprocal, on this point Bandura and Gladwell are in
agreement: we learn through observation
(modeling). Learners watch and observe
the lifestyles or actions of their mentors, parents, leaders, and they establish
belief systems that direct their learning.
In Gladwell’s model this modeling is primarily cultural, although he
states in the interview that he does not know why these cultural legacies
persist.
I think that another point that Gladwell makes is
that once you have reached a certain level of ability or attainment, nothing beyond
that point matters. In other words,
given a “reasonable” match between the task at hand the abilities a person has
to accomplish that task, there is a threshold of sufficiency that one needs to
be successful. Beyond that, other
influences that may contribute to general success can influence outcomes, but,
you cannot assume that a characteristic either precludes success or will always
lead to success. His point is that we
grossly overemphasize the notions of inherent differences in ability, such as
giftedness or talent. Again, at a certain
point, with hard work and persistence, we are all capable. This reminds me of the Dweck article and the
new psychology of success; growth-oriented teaching. This theory, similarly, emphasizes the
ability of individuals to grow their intellect and talents through hard work
and persistent effort.
No comments:
Post a Comment